NT1212
- Synoptic Gospels: Luke
Spring Semester 2003
Instructor:
Office: Bockman 110; Phone: 651-641-3252;
E-mail: jboyce@luthersem.edu
Web site: www.luthersem.edu/jboyce; Blackboard Course Site: www.fishersnet.net
Class:
Monday & Friday:
Office
Hours: Monday, Wednesday, Friday:
Students who wish to receive a letter
grade and/or written evaluation for the course, please see "Letter Grade
Option" in the Catalog regarding the need to inform the instructor of this
desire within the first two weeks of the term.
Course
Description
An examination of the claims about
God and God's creation in Matthew, Mark, or Luke. The chief aim is thorough
knowledge of one Gospel, which draws upon traditions of biblical interpretation
and reflects on central matters of faith and life. Similarities and differences with the other
Synoptic Gospels are explored, and the theological implications of multiple
stories of Jesus are addressed.
Objectives
1. To
inspire a deeper love for the story of Jesus and a growing conviction of the
power of the scriptures to nourish and transform communities.
2. To
gain confidence in reading the gospel and in expressing what it means to
interpret it faithfully and argue its claims, while appreciating the need to
distinguish what the text says from what we might want it to say.
3. To
gain a special understanding of the plot of one of the Synoptic Gospels while
appreciating the differences, similarities, and theological claims which each
of the Synoptic Gospels makes.
4. To
gain ability to read the text carefully and deal with issues raised by multiple
witnesses to the story of Jesus.
5. To
gain ability to make a balanced use of commentaries and other secondary
literature.
TextBooks
for the Course
Required:
Mark A. Powell. Fortress Introduction to the Gospels.
Fortress
Alternative:
EITHER/OR
Kohlenberger, Exhaustive Concordance to
the Greek NT
EITHER/OR
Kohlenberger, Greek-English Concordance
to the NT (NIV)
Alternative:
EITHER/OR Joel
B. Green. The Gospel of Luke. New
International Commentary, 1997
EITHER/OR Luke
Timothy Johnson. The Gospel of Luke.
Sacra Pagina.
EITHER/OR David
L. Tiede. Luke.
Recommended
Synopsis of the Four Gospels (English Edition OR Greek Edition)
Frederick W.
Danker. Luke. Proclamation
Commentaries. Fortress
Joel B. Green,
ed. Hearing the New Testament :
Strategies for Interpretation. Eerdmans
Luke T. Johnson.
The Writings of the New Testament: An
Interpretation. Fortress
Donald H. Juel. A Master of Surprise., chap 9:
"Becoming an Audience." Fortress.
Donald H. Jule. The Gospel of Mark.Abingdon,
"Introduction: Interpreting Mark's Gospel"
Jack D.
Kingsbury, Jesus Christ in Matthew, Mark,
and Luke. Proclamation Commentaries. Fortress
A. Neyrey. The Social World of Luke-Acts.
Hendrickson
Mark Allan
Powell. What are they Saying about Luke.
Paulist
Eduard
Schweizer. The Good News According to
Luke. John Knox
Jane Shaberg,"Luke"
in Women's Bible Commentary, pp. 275-292
Christopher
Tuckett. Reading the New Testament:
Methods of Interpretation. Fortress.
Interpretation 48/4 (October, 1994). "The Gospel
of Luke" (online through first search)
Word
& World 12/1 (1992)
"Luke-Acts" (online at Word & World web site)
Essays
for Study of the Synoptic Gospels,
ed. by NT Faculty (duplicated, on reserve)
Class Sessions (see
Course Schedule)
The class meets three hours each week,
for reading of gospel texts, for lecture/discussion of issues related to
interpretation of the Synoptic Gospels, and for building of interpretive skills
for reading biblical texts, with primary focus on the Gospel of Luke. Small
group conversation will also be used at times both within and outside of class
as noted in "Assignments" to focus reading and interpreting of
biblical texts. For this purpose members of the class will divide into groups
of 4-5 persons that will work together throughout the course.
Expectations
Work to be completed by students and upon
which evaluation and credit will be based includes the following:
(1) Regular
attendance at lecture/discussion and small group sessions.
(2) Completion
of assigned readings and informed reflection on them for and in class
discussion.
(3) Reading
of the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke, preferably in one or two sittings
each. Reading of Luke to be completed in
connection with the Reading/Writing assignment below. Reading of Mark to be
completed for class on Monday, February 17. Reading of Matthew to be completed
for class on Wednesday, February 19.
4) Completion
of 10 "Exegetical Workshop" assignments: focusing on resources/
skills for asking questions of a biblical text (see Course Schedule)
(5) Completion
of Greek(Mdiv)/English(MA) Readings Assignments (see attached sheet)
(6) Secondary
Reading Assignments:
(7) Completion
of two study and writing projects as outlined below.
(8) Completion
of assignment in connection with introduction to library resources and research
methods. (Distributed separately). These skills are also to be incorporated
into writing project two as noted below.
Library Exercise Due by Friday, March 28
Reading/Written
Assignments:
Form groups of 4-5 persons. Groups will meet outside and in class to
complete the following reading/writing assignments:
Project One (4 pages)
1. By Friday, February 28, read through
the Gospel of Luke (preferably in one or two sittings, and out loud to one
another within your study groups)
2. Based upon your hearing
of the Gospel of Luke, write a four page essay (type-written, double-spaced)
which presents:
a. what you
hear: what claims does the Gospel of Luke make concerning God, Jesus, and the
future?; what issues are at stake in this
telling of the story of Jesus?
b. the
manner in which the narrative makes these claims persuasive to readers/hearers;
and
c. how you
see this story's part in yours and the Christian community's continued telling
of the story of Jesus.
3. Submit a copy of this
essay to each member of your study group by Wednesday, March 5. Group members are to write at least one
paragraph and no more than two paragraphs of comments on each of the papers and
return to the author by Monday, March 10.
4. Write a revised draft
of your essay, taking into account the comments of your group members and any
further reflections on the gospel of Luke. This revised draft (4 pages) is to
be turned in to the instructor by Monday, March 17.
Project
Two (6-8 pages)
A six to eight page
essay of interpretive study and reflection on a story (pericope) from Luke,
growing out of personal study and reflection; group discussion; and
conversation with secondary sources according to the process outlined below.
Step One: Your own hearing of the text
Choose a story from the Gospel of Luke to be your special focus for this semester. Read it carefully, without reliance on secondary sources, noting questions, observations, issues, conclusions for the claims made in the story and for your own telling of the story that emerge in your hearing (see the "Exegetical Method" handout and "Exegetical Workshop" resources for suggestions). Again allow your reflection to be shaped by the same questions noted in project one above (2 a,b,c). Write down these reflections (3-4 pages double-spaced) and make enough copies for members of your study group. This work is to be completed by Monday, April 14.
Step Two: Hearing the text within a community
During meetings in your
study groups during classtime on Monday, April 14 and Wednesday, April 16, for
each member, 1) tell the story from memory or in your own words, 2) reflect on
the text together along with each person's written reflections; 3) then write
(add) 1-2 pages of further reflection on the text that has arisen from this
discussion in your small groups.
Step Three: Hearing within the larger community or
tradition
Incorporate skills from
Library session: Making use of the
ATLA (ATLA Religion Database) or R&TA (Religious & Theological
Abstracts) do research to find journal or essay literature on your chosen
passage. Develop a bibliography of at least three articles (since 1980 if
possible) on your passage and one recent article of more general or related
interest on the Gospel of Luke. Attach this bibliography to your paper.
Read at least one of
these articles, and also commentary on your passage in at least two different
commentaries. Indicate which
articles/commentaries you have read, and in 1-2 pages, summarize what this
enlarged conversation adds to your own reflection individually and in your
group. Do any different theological
agendas or perspectives shape their discussion? Are any new or different claims
or issues raised? How does their hearing
compare with yours? Now gather, organize, and synthesize into a final essay your
own interpretation of the passage as it has been informed by these three stages
of hearing and study.
Two copies of this final
essay, collecting and organizing these three stages (6-8 pages, double-spaced)
is due to your instructor by Wednesday, May 7.
One copy will be used to make copies of papers for distribution to the
whole class and will be returned to you.
|
Mon. Feb
10 |
1. |
Introduction/ Organization of the
Course |
|
Wed 12 |
2. |
How do we Read? People of the Word/
Hearing in Context |
|
Fri 14 |
3. |
"Exegetical Workshop" introduction |
|
Mon 17 |
4. |
Beginnings I: Shaping a Hearer/Reader:
Mark 1:1-15 |
|
Wed 19 |
5. |
Beginnings II: Reading/Hearing the
text: Matthew 1:1-17 |
|
Fri 21 |
6. |
Small Groups: Reading Luke |
|
Mon 24 |
7. |
Beginnings III: What is God About: Luke
1 |
|
Wed 26 |
8. |
"Unto You this day" Luke 2 |
|
Fri 28 |
9. |
"Exegetical Workshop 1":
Comparing Translations |
|
Mon 3 |
10.
|
"Today this scripture
fulfilled" Luke 4:14-30 (Epiphany 3-4) |
|
Wed 5 |
11.
|
"Not the Righteous, but
Sinners" Luke |
|
Frid 7 |
12.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 2":
Comparing the Synoptic Gospels |
|
Mon 10 |
13.
|
Library Exercise (Class split) |
|
Wed 12 |
14.
|
Library Exercise (Class split) |
|
Frid 14 |
15.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 3":
Completing a Word Study |
|
Mon 17 |
16.
|
"One who hears my word" Luke
6:17-49 (Epiphany 6,7,8) |
|
Wed 19 |
17.
|
"Who is this who forgives
sins" Luke 7:11-50 (Pent 10,11) |
|
Fri 21 |
18.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 4":
Finding Old Testament Connections |
|
Mon 24 |
19.
|
"Who do you say that I am"
Luke 9:18-36 (Lent 2, Epiphany) |
|
Wed 26 |
|
READING DAY: No Class |
|
Fri 28 |
20.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 5": Paying
Attention to Place |
|
Mon 31 |
21.
|
He Set His Face" Luke |
|
Wed Apr 2 |
22.
|
"Lord, Teach us to Pray" Luke
11:1-3 (Pent 17) |
|
Fri 4 |
23.
|
"Exegetical Workshop
6":Tracing Movement Within a Text |
|
Mon 7 |
24.
|
"Your Father's Good pleasure"
Luke 12:22-49 (Pent 19) |
|
Wed 9 |
25.
|
"Banquet Etiquette" Luke
14:1-24 (Pent 22) |
|
Fri 11 |
26.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 7":
Paying Attention to Time |
|
Mon 14 |
27.
|
Group Discussions: Essay Project 2:
Step 1 |
|
Wed 16 |
28.
|
Group Discussions: Essay Project 2:
Step 1 |
|
17-22 |
|
EASTER BREAK |
|
Wed 23 |
29.
|
"Rejoice with Me" Luke
15:1-32 (Pent 24) |
|
Fri 25 |
30.
|
"Exegetical Workshop
8":Deciding on Beginnings and Endings |
|
Mon 28 |
31.
|
"Righteousness and
Faithfulness" Luke 16 – 18:17 (Pent 25-30) |
|
Wed 30 |
32.
|
"Today Salvation has
Happened" Luke 19:1-10 (Pent 31) |
|
Fri May 2 |
33.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 9":
Getting to Know Characters |
|
Mon 5 |
34.
|
"Passion and Execution" Luke
22-23 (Passion) |
|
Wed
7 |
35.
|
Endings I: Mark 16:1-8: How will we
read hear? Easter B |
|
Frid 9 |
36.
|
"Exegetical Workshop 10":
Relating a Part to the Whole Gospe l |
|
Mon 12 |
37.
|
Endings II: Mathew 28:1-20: Is it true?
Easter A |
|
Wed 14 |
38.
|
Endings III: Luke 24: Telling the Story
and Faith Easter C |
|
Fri 16 |
39.
|
|
Each student is expected to complete
focused work on selected portions of the text of Luke's Gospel in conjunction
with textual focus for the week (M.Div students are
to do this work on the basis of the Greek text, making use of resources such as
an interlinear, Rogers, New Linguistic and Exegetical Key, or Zerwick-Grosvenor, Grammatical Analysis, etc. MA
students should do commensurate analysis of the text by choosing two or three
English translations to compare closely. Accountability for this work is to be
self-initialed.
In this work the student should pay
attention to particular matters of grammar, syntax, vocabulary, themes, etc.
(cf. "Exegetical Workshop") that reveal matters of interest or
importance for understanding or class discussion.
(To be handed in with the final essay and
notes)
Student' Name____________________________
Week of Reading Initials
AND Date
Week of: Feb 24 Luke 2:1-14 ____________________
Week of: Mar 3 Luke 4:14-21;
Week of: Mar 17 Luke 6:17-26 ____________________
Week of: Mar 24 Luke 7:36-50 ____________________
Week of: Mar 31 Luke 9:51-62 ____________________
Week of:Apr 7 Luke
Week of Apr 23 Luke 15:1-10 ____________________
Week of: Apr 28 Luke 19:1-10 ____________________
Week of May 12 Luke 24:44-49 ____________________
AN
INTERPRETIVE APPROACH FOR NT STUDY
Exegesis
aims at hearing and understanding a text in a conscious and deliberate
way. Exegesis is both a science and an
art. It is a form of disciplined
meditation, whereby the exegete is opened by the Spirit to hear the text new or
anew as the text is allowed to be what it is intended to be—the Word of God. Exegesis should begin with an encounter
between the exegete and the text in which the imagination is stimulated when
fruitful questions are asked of the text.
Secondary resources are to be used only as a broader conversation to
test and extend your own exegetical work.
Thus they should be read with your (1) developed questions, (2)
identified problems, and (3) working conclusions in mind. Still exegesis is never a private enterprise.
Your own understanding will be revised as it is constantly (re)shaped within
the hearing of others within the community.
The
following list of questions may have some sequential sense, but not
necessarily. The questions often move in a circular and interdependent fashion
with the imagination.
|
TRANSLATION& COMPARISON |
Derive a good working translation of the text,
paying attention to
·
significant details of grammar and literary structure;
·
important textual variants and how modern translations
have treated them;
·
comparison of the Greek text with how it has been
translated in various modern translations. Does this comparison highlight any significant
problems of interpretation? |
|
BEGINNINGS & ENDINGS |
Consider what is the proper unit for reading:
·
Are there any words, or shifts in scenery, subject matter,
or thought that mark the beginning and end of the unit?
·
How does this compare with lectionary decisions? |
|
LITERARY or NARRATIVE FORM |
Pay attention to matters of: Movement
or Plot:
Read the text several times in Greek (or good English translations), seeking
to follow the flow of the narrative or argument.
·
How would you outline the plot, argument, or flow of
thought: beginning, middle, and end?
·
Do particular words, phrases, or structures contribute to
the sense of flow in the story? Do the flow of thought and the narrative order
coincide, or are there surprises or reversals? Time: How do details of
the order, duration, or frequency of events effect the narrative? Geography: How do aspects of
scenery or place affect the telling? Characters: Who are the main
characters and how do they function in the story? in relation to Jesus? Narrator
and Point of View:
What do you detect of the attitude, point of view, or trustworthiness of the
voice that tells the story? Implicit
Commentary:
Are aspects of misunderstanding, irony, or symbolism crucial to an adequate
hearing of the story? |
|
WORDS & THEIR LINKS |
What important or thematic words shape the
thought or movement of the narrative? Use a concordance to discover words that are
important within this author or the biblical tradition. |
|
CONTEXT and KNOWLEDGE of the HEARER |
What difference does it make to imagine the
hearer of this story as one located:
·
during the life and ministry of Jesus?
·
in the life and setting of the early church?
·
in the contemporary Christian community?
·
outside of the Christian community? What does the hearer need to know to hear the
story in its full reference?
·
e.g. How do Scriptural citations, allusions, or themes
shape the telling? |
|
SYNOPTIC COMPARISON |
Where applicable use a synopsis to compare
with other tellings of the same story. What is different or distinctive about
this telling? (consider aspects noted above; synoptic underlining with colors
is useful) |
|
HEARING in COMMUNITY |
How does the text overall address the hearer
—as conflict, proverb, parable, prophetic/apocalyptic saying, teaching,
miracle (healing, nature), or narrative event? Allow the text to have its say: Can you state
the central thought of the text in a single sentence? What does it say as a Word of God to the
church today? Is it a word of judgment or hope; of law or
promise? How will you proclaim or teach from this text
in a way addresses your community? |